Lord of the Ring
posted on 2 September 2007
To me in no way disappointed the second part, and I will attempt to transfer all pluses of this film. First, the basic merit of this film - this, of course, entertainment. All these panoramas, gorge, cave, locks, battle - all this is simply noticeable, is truly immensely. I boldly can name this film one of the entertainment. In the second place, in the second part appeared completely amazing character - Gollum. Living actor originally played it, and then Golluma was processed on the computer. As a result of this came out something inconceivable - simultaneously repellent and causing pity essence, whose each appearance causes simply enthusiasm, to that potryasayushche this is done. Thirdly, me very vpechatlili enormous combat elephants. Despite the fact that they in this film appear not for the long period of time, they greatly are memorized. This, concerning specials-effect. Fourthly, characters did not completely lose their luster, on the contrary, they became still brighter, it is more interesting. And fifthly, most important - is now clearly understandable, having especially comprehended and "after overcuring" the first part, what Jackson - clever person. He made that which seemed impossible - it filmed the book. And this screening - completely not typical Hollywood cranberry, completely not cheapness, not distribution and not "fastfud from the peace of cinema". Yes, the second part, if we speak only about it, has its deficiencies. They relate to the fact that it is not possible exactly to transfer all details and stratagems of the subject of the book to the screen. Therefore for the spectators, who did not read the book, some things remain not entirely intelligible. But this does not have special importance. Main things in this film - these are the worthy screening of the book and entertainment, and all this in the film is represented fully.
"Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, The" 
: